LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date:
Wed, 2 Dec 2015 20:28:11 -0500
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Open Access, Almost-OA, OA Policies, and Institutional Repositories
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
From: Richard Poynder <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:08:26 +0000

How many of the documents indexed in “open” repositories are in fact
freely available, rather than on “dark deposit” or otherwise
inaccessible.

What is an Immediate-Deposit/Optional-Access (IDOA) mandate, and what
is Almost-OA?

How important is the so-called eprint request Button to the success of
the IDOA mandate, and how efficacious is the Button in allowing
readers to obtain copies of items held on dark deposit in
repositories?

I offer some thoughts on these and related matters in a document that
can be accessed here:

http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/open-access-almost-oa-oa-policies-and.html

Richard Poynder

ATOM RSS1 RSS2