LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 10 Jul 2016 18:01:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
From: Joseph Esposito <[log in to unmask]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 20:22:11 -0400

Why "only"? Isn't that figure incredibly high? I never thought they
would reach that figure. It would be interesting to learn how UC
managed to do this.

Joe Esposito

Joseph J. Esposito
Processed Media
[log in to unmask]
@josephjesposito
+Joseph Esposito

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 7:20 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
>
> https://shar.es/1ljH1g
>
> Three years after the university system's Academic Senate approved a
> bold plan to make faculty research freely available, only 25 percent
> of professors are putting their papers in a state-created repository.
>
>
> --
> Sanford G. Thatcher
> Frisco, TX  75034-5514
> https://scholarsphere.psu.edu

ATOM RSS1 RSS2