LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: U. of California's Open-Access Promise Hits a Snag: The Faculty
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 10 Jul 2016 18:02:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines) 
From: Martha <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 20:36:44 -0400

The other way to look at this is that since the passage of the
mandate, there are some 12,500 UC researchers producing work that is
openly available to the public.  That seems like something to
celebrate!

Best,
Martha

Martha Kelehan
Head of Collections, Tisch Library
Tufts University

> On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:20 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
>
> https://shar.es/1ljH1g
>
> Three years after the university system's Academic Senate approved a
> bold plan to make faculty research freely available, only 25 percent
> of professors are putting their papers in a state-created repository.
>
>
> --
> Sanford G. Thatcher
> Frisco, TX  75034-5514
> https://scholarsphere.psu.edu

ATOM RSS1 RSS2