LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:18:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
From: Amy Schuler <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:13:49 -0400

In this short message, there is much that could be debated.  However,
I will only say that although political science is not a pure science,
it is certainly more than just politics.  Please educate yourself.

Amy Schuler
Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Millbrook, NY

-----Original Message-----

From: Ari Belenkiy <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 15:19:19 -0700

"Political science" is not a science but politics. Perhaps good that
it is not to be funded anymore by NSF.

Ari Belenkiy


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:50 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:17:33 -0500
>
> You may have heard that the Senate has just passed legislation, likely
> to be passed by the House also, that removes most funding of political
> science research by the NSF.  In this case, austerity was used as an
> excuse to do something that Republicans have long wanted to do for
> political reasons anyway.
>
> Sandy Thatcher

ATOM RSS1 RSS2