LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:27:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
From: Wilhelmina Randtke <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:41:05 -0500

Dear Zac Rolnik (and other readers)

Why do you think customers will want to buy the version of record?
This is an honest question, not a challenge.  With the types of
reports published on nowpublishers.com , the only advantage I can see
to going and getting a report direct from you is that it will be the
most current version or the most current report on that topic.  So, I
can see each pirated report being an advertisement for different
reports on a similar topic, but not a reason to go and buy that same
exact report.

-Wilhelmina Randtke


On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:15 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: Zac Rolnik <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:47:28 -0400
>
> Sorry for the late response to this interesting question, but I have
> been traveling....
>
> In terms of the piracy issue, while it is annoying for smaller
> publishers we simply do not have the resources to fight it.  When we
> find a pirated version of one of our titles, we immediately go to the
> source and they typically take it down, for it only to pop up
> somewhere else.  Very frustrating.  So this is one issue where we try
> and let the big publishers (who have more skin in the game) take the
> lead and we act as free-riders.  In addition, there are some who think
> for a small publisher it might actually serve to promote our titles,
> since most of our customers want to buy the version of record and
> those who get pirated copies would probably never buy it anyway - but
> might encourage their colleagues and libraries to look at it.
>
> Zac Rolnik
> now publishers
>
>
> *******************
>
> From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:43:27 -0400
>
> TED talks are very trendy these days, and often very interesting.
> Here's an analytical treatment of the question of financial losses
> through copyright piracy, a video whose URL has been making its way
> around the internet in the last couple of days -- and I shamelessly
> stole the link from one of these several lists:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZadCj8O1-0&feature=youtube_gdata_player
>
> This tongue-in-cheek presentation makes me ask:  is copyright piracy
> really a problem for scholarly publishers?  Subscription journals?
> Monographs?
>
> If so, how would we know how large the problem is?  More than that --
> how would we know if it were big enough to worry about?  See, what is
> true in the video is that a lot of the estimates of future loss are
> based on a future that isn't known.  Anyhow, don't scholarly
> publishers, at least of e-journals, expect some leakage and don't our
> subscription prices pay for that?
>
> Thoughts?  Ann Okerson

ATOM RSS1 RSS2