LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Apr 2016 14:47:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
From: "Garewal,Kevin R" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 18:31:49 +0000

Good afternoon,

I usually try to remove site references and define authorized user
more precisely.  I have found once I explain our authentication
systems this alleviates the worries about restricted sites.

Kevin

-------- Original message --------
From: Winston Tabb <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:46:52 +0000

I agree, and we have been pushing back.  Our argument is that people
use collections, not sites.  This is just one more irritating and
pernicious way in which we are being gouged.

Winston Tabb
The Johns Hopkins University

ATOM RSS1 RSS2