LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Cabell's Whitelist/Blacklist vs Beall
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Jul 2017 18:27:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
From: "Sowards, Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:42:59 +0000

Given the widespread interest on this list in Beall's list and the
factors that led to its demise, I wonder if anyone has comments or
information about this new for-fee alternative from Cabell?

http://www.universityaffairs.ca/news/news-article/u-s-company-launches-new-blacklist-deceptive-academic-journals/

What prevents the same limitations, cautions and misunderstandings
from playing out once again?

Steven Sowards
Associate Director for Collections
Michigan State University Libraries
366 W. Circle Drive
East Lansing MI 48824

ATOM RSS1 RSS2