LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 May 2013 19:46:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 19:25:36 -0500

No, sorry, if that was what you were questioning, I agree that THAT is
a ridiculous assertion.


> From: Winston Tabb <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 02:33:49 +0000
>
> Sandy:  You believe the Wiley assertion that fair use applies only to print?
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 18:02:07 -0500
>
> Well, maybe not, since outside of a specific set of factual
> circumstances, no one knows what "fair use" means. And given how some
> people and associations (like the ARL) interpret it, this opens a door
> wide enough to drive a Mack truck through!
>
> Sandy Thatcher
>
>
>>  From: Winston Tabb <[log in to unmask]>
>
>  > Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 21:35:29 +0000
>  >
>  > That is a ridiculous assertion by Wiley.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2