LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: OA and NIH public access compliance and enforcement?
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 29 Apr 2012 22:27:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines) 
From: Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:32:56 -0400


> From: "Wise, Alicia (ELS-OXF)" <[log in to unmask]>
>
> I suspect compliance enforcement may not be such an issue for NIH
> because so many publishers deposit on behalf of their authors.  It's
> one of the ways publishers have constructively engaged with the NIH on
> implementation of its open access policy.  Elsevier has deposited
> manuscripts into PMC on behalf of authors since 2005, for example.

1. Compliance is certainly an issue for NIH, until the deposit rate is at or
near 100%

2. Deposit rate is nowhere near 100% for two reasons:

2a. Mixed publisher and fundee deposit instead of institutionally
monitored fundee deposit

2b. Central deposit instead of institutionally monitored
institutional deposit.

Stevan Harnad

ATOM RSS1 RSS2