From: adam hodgkin <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:05:47 +0200

Also well researched (its worth digging through to the full paper)
with plenty of opinions.

https://greenelab.github.io/scihub-manuscript/#ref-cunYx7X4

A few points struck me:

Open Access is poorly covered, and book chapters relatively poorly represented.

The claim in the interview that libraries and publishers (for
different reasons) cannot support Sci-Hub but are perhaps unwillingly
abetting it. So the need for Sci-Hub is paradoxically increased by
efforts to ignore, suppress or defeat it.

there will be a lot of heat generated over his claim that his paper
marks the  "beginning of the end for subscription scholarly
publishing."

Adam

Adam Hodgkin
www.exacteditions.com
and my book Following Searle on Twitter
http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo25370730.html


On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:42 AM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:53:28 -0700
>
> An article in Science (appearing there makes it important) makes a striking prognosis about the future of journal publication.  No comment!
>
> http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/07/sci-hub-s-cache-pirated-papers-so-big-subscription-journals-are-doomed-data-analyst
>
> Jim O'Donnell
> ASU