LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Apr 2014 20:17:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
From: Joseph Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 10:48:24 -0400

Chuck,

Surely some CCC revenue ends up with authors, but CCC is not in a
position to know.  I am not defending (or attacking) CCC in saying
this; I'm simply trying to explain how it works.  CCC collects revenue
and remits a portion of that to the publishers of the content used.
CCC does not have access to the contracts that publishers have with
authors.  The CCC revenue is accounted for by publishers as subsidiary
rights income.  That income may or not be split (evenly or unevenly)
with authors.  It depends on the individual contract.  As a gross
generalization, most journal articles are not royalty-bearing for
authors, but most books are.  The number of exceptions and
qualifications to what I just wrote is endless.

Joe Esposito


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:02 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: "Hamaker, Charles" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 00:06:06 +0000
>
> And some of that CCC income stream ends up in author's pockets ?  I
> don't think so. I've got several articles CCC tracks. But never seen a
> cent.nor ever heard of any author of articles who has. When i asked
> the publisher assured me it wasn't large enough a source to warrant
> tracking it.
>
> Chuck

ATOM RSS1 RSS2