LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:51:36 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
From: Anthony Watkinson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:59:13 +0100

David:

You are sophisticated person. There is no evidence that people in
emerging countries do have problems with this sort of spam and take it
at its face value. Some of this spam is quite cleverly worded (though
some is obviously not) and academics I have been interviewed are
annoyed because they do have to look more carefully to make sure that
it is not what is claimed to be. I advise looking at the OASPA
membership list

Anthony

-----Original Message-----
From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:04:37 +0100

I got an email that looked suspiciously like spam from a publisher
today.  I deleted it.  It is all really very, very easy.

David


On 9 Apr 2013, at 20:30, LIBLICENSE wrote:

From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 00:32:17 -0500

It is unfortunate that there are so many gullible academics willing to
lend their names and prestige to enterprises that are running these
dubious operations.  Perhaps part of graduate education should include
an introduction to the world of publishing that would enable future
professors to distinguish fraudulent from real publishers.

Sandy Thatcher

ATOM RSS1 RSS2