LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 May 2013 18:02:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 17:43:17 -0500

Does anyone know if the 30% includes all of the journals identified by
Beall as "predatory"? Is there any other way for a "predatory" journal
to make money than by charging APCS (and sponsoring "conferences")?
Are all the "predatory" journals listed in the DOAJ? Are there any
criteria applied to journals that are listed there?

Sandy Thatcher


> From: Kevin Smith <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 00:32:08 +0000
>
> Agreed.  And it is worth noting that nearly 70% of gold OA journals do
> not charge APCs.  So we are talking about a minority of journals
> within only one of the OA business models.
>
> Kevin L. Smith, J.D.
> Director of Scholarly Communication
> Duke University Libraries
> P.O. Box 90193
> Durham, NC 27708

ATOM RSS1 RSS2