LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:52:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:58:59 -0500

Does this well the ARL Code of Best Practices in Fair Use?

http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/copyright-ip/fair-use/code-of-best-practices#.VN0vc8aDlXA

*******

New Fair Use Guide Helps Distinguish Between Copyright and Copywrong

http://hyperallergic.com/181301/new-fair-use-guide-helps-distinguish-between-copyright-and-copywrong/

"Each section of the code could be summarized as such: ‘Yes, you can
claim fair use when using images of someone else’s art, but … ‘ Many
of the caveats come down to common sense — art history teachers
shouldn’t make high-resolution digital images of artworks they’re
using in their classes widely available to people not enrolled in
those classes, attribution should be given wherever and whenever
possible, etc. — and being prepared to justify one’s use of an artwork
if called upon to do so by a copyright owner. Others are clearly
informed by specific cases, like this one .... “Artists should avoid
suggesting that incorporated elements are original to them, unless
that suggestion is integral to the meaning of the new work.”

ATOM RSS1 RSS2