From: Richard Gottlieb <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:54:53 -0500

The reference was not to UC’s decision. Which, under the circumstances
was entirely reasonable.
RG



From: Richard James <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:34:17 -0500

It's entirely sane. UC had the option of making the content compliant,
which would require a substantial infusion of resources, or removing
it from public access, which would cost significantly less. Given
those two choices the outcome was entirely reasonable.


On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:59 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: Richard Gottlieb <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:41:54 -0500
>
> This is insane
> Richard Gottlieb
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:05:16 -0500
>
> Of possible interest:
>
> "The University of California, Berkeley, will cut off public access to
> tens of thousands of video lectures and podcasts in response to a U.S.
> Justice Department order that it make the educational content
> accessible to people with disabilities."
>
> https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/03/06/u-california-berkeley-delete-publicly-available-educational-content#.WL0t2FiZT-k.twitter