From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:23:33 +0000 Did anyone ever believe that social networking sites were open access repositories? And do we have to choose between them? --- Rick Anderson Assoc. Dean for Collections & Scholarly Communication Marriott Library, University of Utah [log in to unmask] On 1/24/16, 5:28 PM, "LibLicense-L Discussion Forum on behalf of LIBLICENSE" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote: >From: Subbiah Arunachalam <[log in to unmask]> >Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:32:35 +0530 > >Our friend Muthu Madhan alerted me to this article on why >institutional repositories are far superior to social networking sites >such as Academia.edu and ResearchGate. > >A social networking site is not an open access repository > >https://misslibrarygrrrl.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/a-social-networking-site-is-not-an-open-access-repository/ > > >Arun >http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4398-4658 >http://www.researcherid.com/rid/B-9925-2009