From: Mark Hemhauser <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 23:36:52 -0700

Thanks. I understand their position, but in an academic research
environment, asking professors and graduate students to vet their
paraphrases of IDC reports with IDC before publishing and before the
data is more than 12 months old is hardly practical. We have put a
notice of this requirement on a webpage that pops up before they can
reach the resource. I feel that's the best we can do to hold up our
end of the license agreement.

Mark

Mark Hemhauser
Head of Acquisitions, The Library
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720-6000


On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:53 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: "Garewal,Kevin R" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 11:26:47 +0000
>
> Good morning,
>
> At my prior university, we had IDC. From my recollection, we got a
> concession or two on the agreement, but no in regards to permission to
> publish the data. Ian is spot on in his description of what we had to
> do each time.
>
> That said, I never had an instance where I found them unreasonable.
> If anything,  they usually made helpful suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> KG