LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 May 2016 16:40:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 23:53:03 -0500

I tried using Google Scholar to locate my most recently published
article: Open-Access Monograph Publishing and the Origins of the
Office of Digital Scholarly Publishing at Penn State University. It
appeared in the April 2015 issue of the Journal of Scholarly
Publishing.  Google Scholar takes me to two sites, the publisher's
site (UTP) and Project Muse. Interestingly, it does not take me to
Penn State's IR where the Green OA version of the article may be
obtained. So, in this instance, although an OA version of the article
is available, Google Scholar does not help locate it.

Sandy Thatcher



At 9:21 PM -0400 5/4/16, LIBLICENSE wrote:
>
> From: "Hinchliffe, Lisa W" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 23:24:19 +0000
>
> I always enjoy a thought experimentÅ .
>
> If content were all open (and in this thought experiment let's assume
> that is retroactive as well), GS could serve the function (as long as
> GOOG keeps it around). But, if we in libraries could re-purpose all
> the effort that is currently spent in libraries on enabling
> toll-access and mitigating against breaches, we might also create
> in-the-workflow tools for research groups/communities/campuses that
> would put access and discovery into existing information task tools
> rather than relying on a separate GS or the like system where
> information resources are retrieved and then brought into other
> systems for use, manipulation, etc. They could instead be accessed in
> situ. Especially if we are talking known item retrieval. For topical
> searches, I think the lessons of many studies of web-scale discovery
> thus far show that - as much value as there can be in "here's
> everything search across it" - there is also value in curated
> collections for particular communities and content areas. So, we could
> do more of that as well if we didn't have to always battle against
> content being in different toll-access systems.
>
> Lisa
>
> **********************************************************************************************************
> Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
> Professor/ Coordinator for Information Literacy Services and Instruction
> University Library, University of Illinois, 1408 West Gregory Drive,
> Urbana, Illinois 61801
> [log in to unmask], 217-333-1323 (v), 217-244-4358 (f)
> **********************************************************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2