LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Jun 2012 22:51:19 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
From: Anthony Watkinson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:39:02 +0100

A senior US librarian has raised this question with me: "I do think that
there  has to be a way devised to look at all the self-published books out
there and find a way to rate them in some professional way for libraries.
Maybe it's an opportunity for librarians to take the lead? Do you know of
any initiatives in that regard?".

I do not know of any initiatives. I know library initiatives have been
proposed over the years particularly in the seminal Raym Crow case for
institutional repositories in 2002
(see:http://works.bepress.com/ir_research/7/)
but did any involving libraries organising peer review in this way get off the
ground or are actually going strong?

Anthony

ATOM RSS1 RSS2