LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 May 2013 17:57:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 21:00:59 -0500

I would be curious to know if Kevin can cites cases where fair use has
trumped the terms of a licensing agreement that specifically forbids
something that would normally be considered fair use.

Sandy Thatcher


At 8:05 PM -0400 5/19/13, LIBLICENSE wrote:
>
> From: "Shipley, Michele" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 14:15:13 -0400
>
> In the past year both Elsevier and McGraw-Hill have been unwilling to
> add language acknowledging fair use to license agreements I've
> negotiated for Miner Library. The advice I received from the
> University of Rochester's Office of Counsel agreed with what Kevin
> says below. In both cases I made sure that all reasonable uses were
> included in the license agreement.
>
> Michele
>
> Michele Shipley, MLS
> Assistant Director of Digital & Branch Libraries
> Edward G. Miner Library
> University of Rochester Medical Center
> Rochester, NY 14642
> [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2