LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:04:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 16:56:47 -0500

This daft report has appeared from a relatively new organization
called The Open Science Initiative Working group of the national
Science Communication Institute.  It doesn't seem possible tell who
the drafting/editing people were, pulling together from what was
obviously a much larger conversation.  Apparently a large group of
thought leaders was invited to join an email dialog.  24 of them chose
to sign the document and 90 didn't, for whatever reason.  Would be
interesting to hear more about this report from those who know more.

Meanwhile, the draft (final report to be released in March) highlights
the diversity in in perceptions about open access.  It recommends 10
years of high level (productive) conference-based conversations and
recommends exploring "the world's first all-scholarship repository,"
stating that work is already in progress about this.

Any more information available about this ASR?

See:

Summary Blog Post
http://nationalscience.org/nsci-focus-areas/science-writing/2015/open-science-initiative-issues-new-paper-recommendations/

Full Text
http://nationalscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/OSI-report-Feb-2015.pdf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2