From: Richard Poynder <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:46:24 +0100

Anthony,

My assertion was not based solely on the views and experience of Peter
Murray-Rust, as those who read the PDF file will see. I don't doubt that
the RSC and the ACS would disagree, but feel free to send me some names of
scientists you know who would disagree. I am more than happy to hear their
views.

Richard

>>

From: Anthony Watkinson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:00:05 +0100

Richard: I wonder how you know that Aspesi is right. It seems a daring
assertion. Much as I admire Peter M-R, I do not see him as representative
of the views of the large chemistry community to which he belongs. I wonder
if the RSC or the ACS have any evidence on this point.

Anthony

On 10 Jun 2012, at 23:50, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Richard Poynder <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:41:18 +0100

> In a recent investment report, analyst Claudio Aspesi concluded that a
> new front had opened up in the Open Access (OA) debate. Writing in
> April, Aspesi noted that academics are “increasingly protesting the
> limitations to the usage of the information and data contained in the
> articles published through subscription models, and — in particular —
> to the practice of text mining articles.”  Aspesi is right, and a
> central figure in this battleground is University of Cambridge chemist
> Peter Murray-Rust. A long-time advocate for open data, Murray-Rust is
> now spearheading an initiative to draft a “Content Mining
> Declaration”. What is the background to this?

>http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/new-declaration-of-rights-open-content.html