LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Submissions Drop at World's Largest Open-Access Publisher
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Jun 2014 01:20:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
From: Jan Velterop <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:25:04 +0100

What might Science/AAAS be trying to convey by having the headline
"Submissions Drop at World's Largest Open-Access Journal", whereas the
figures presented concern not the number of submissions, but the
number of published articles?

Submissions may have dropped more. Or less. I would have thought it
behoves a science magazine to be diligent, even with its news items.

Jan Velterop


On 5 Jun 2014, at 07:57, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Philip Davis <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:39:38 -0400
>
> Of possible interest…
>
> Submissions Drop at World's Largest Open-Access Publisher
> Science/AAAS News, June 4, 2014
>
> A 25% decline in papers in last 5 months suggests PLOS ONE's allure is fading
>
> http://news.sciencemag.org/people-events/2014/06/submissions-drop-worlds-largest-open-access-publisher

ATOM RSS1 RSS2