LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:39:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
From: Jan Szczepanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:52:52 +0200

Dear All,

A good step forward in Germany would be to ask the Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek
to be more cautious what to include. DOAJ has delted a lot of
predatory journals, EZ B has
not. You have to demand a better and more careful selection of titles
if libraries still want
to be a guarantee for quality.

Jan

Jan Szczepański
F.d Förste bibliotekarie och chef för f.d Avdelningen för humaniora,
vid f.d. Centralbiblioteket, Göteborgs universitetsbibliotek
E-post: [log in to unmask]


2015-09-11 3:31 GMT+02:00 LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>:
>
> From: "Bargheer, Margo Friederike" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:07:43 +0000
>
> Dear All,
> as it became obvious in the last years, running black lists on
> malpractice in publishing quickly opens up new problems. Just a few
> days ago in a panel discussion during the Open Access Days in Zürich
> one of the panelists, a life science researcher, accused an Open
> Access publisher as predatory because he had received an unqualified
> invitation for a review. The questioned publisher is a member of OASPA
> and serves the needs of several research communities very well --
> however obviously not exactly the one of our panelist.
>
> Instead of black lists run by individuals and thus depending on their
> personal judgement I think we need white lists resting on practice and
> crowd-sourced effort.
>
> The platform "Quality Open Access Market"
>
> https://www.qoam.eu/about
>
> seems quite promising to me [disclaimer: I am positively biased]. It
> rests on a division of labor: librarians or institutional staff feed
> the general metadata of scholarly Open Access journals into the
> system, active contributors (authors and editors) evaluate the
> journal's quality.
>
> In Göttingen I would like to set our workflows as such that each
> author we support with our central Open Access publication fund
> receives an invitation to score the journals he/she has just published
> in. This also against the backdrop that authors have to meet funder's
> requirements to publish OA and increasingly ask for the library's
> advice on how to judge the quality of Open Access journals.
>
> Greetings from Göttingen
>
> Margo Bargheer
>
> Leitung Elektronisches Publizieren ǀ Head of Electronic Publishing
> ----------------------------
> Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
> Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen
> State and University Library Goettingen
>
> tel +49 (0)551 39-91188 ǀ fax +49 (0)551 39-22457
> [log in to unmask]
> www.sub.uni-goettingen.de

ATOM RSS1 RSS2