LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:46:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
From: Camilla MacKay <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:21:53 -0400

An experience with the CCC and article licensing that might be of interest:

About three or four years ago, Bryn Mawr Classical Review received a
check (something under $100, as I recall) from the CCC for licensing
BMCR reviews. BMCR is open access, and moreover, authors sign no
copyright transfer agreements, so BMCR does not hold copyright in the
reviews published, and should not have been receiving a payment for
licensing fees in any case. I called the CCC to ask about the money,
and was told that we could choose to opt out of CCC licensing, so I
did. I think we must have deposited that check; there was no way to
get the money to the rightful owners because the specific reviews were
not identified.

When I checked the CCC site just now, I see that it's still possible
to request a "special order" for BMCR articles. I don't know what
would happen if someone tried to license a BMCR article now, but at
least we haven't received any more checks. But there seem to be plenty
of OA journals in the CCC database with licensing options; do they all
know they're represented?

Camilla MacKay
(co-editor, BMCR)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2