LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:22:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
From: David Prosser <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:44:40 +0100

For the purposes of comparison, could somebody point us to good
figures for the average amount (per page, say) spent on copyediting by
a solid, middle-tier journal?  Not the very top-end journals, but one
you might find somewhere half-way down (or up) its category in the
journal citation rankings.

Thanks,  David


On 13 Jun 2012, at 23:13, LIBLICENSE wrote:

> From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:20:26 -0500
>
> Ok, I have read all of these articles now, and I see absolutely no
> mention of one important cost factor that does not go away when one
> moves from a TA to an OA model: copyediting. How, one wonders, does
> PeerJ expect to provide professional copyediting for an author who
> pays only $259 for a life membership when that is about what it would
> cost to edit a single article? Can this new business plan really work
> if copyediting is provided to an author for multiple articles over
> time whose cost for editing will surely exceed, by multiples, the
> initial membership fee? Or is there no mention of this because
> copyediting will be a "value added" service for which authors will
> have to pay an extra fee each time beyond the membership fee? The
> "pre-prints" of course will not be copyedited, but surely PeerJ cannot
> expect to sustain itself as a high-quality journal if it does not
> provide first-rate copyediting for the "versions of record."
>
> Sandy Thatcher
>
>
>> From: Ann Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
>> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:05:07 -0400
>>
>> Many articles today about PeerJ, FYI.   And I'm sure there were more
>> than this!  Cheers, Ann Okerson
>>
>> http://www.nature.com/news/journal-offers-flat-fee-for-all-you-can-publish-1.10811
>>
>> http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/content-and-e-books/article/52512-scholarly-publishing-2012-meet-peerj.html
>>
>> http://www.thedigitalshift.com/2012/06/publishing/new-open-access-academic-publisher-promises-to-revolutionize-business-model/
>>
>> http://blog.mendeley.com/open-access/an-interview-with-the-founders-of-peerj-an-innovative-new-academic-publishing-startup/
>>
>> http://scienceblogs.com/confessions/2012/06/12/interview-with-peter-binfield-and-jason-hoyt-of-peerj/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2