LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Update on the Research Works Act
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:10:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
From: Richard Poynder <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:22:04 +0000

A number of organisations and publishers have released statements
about the Research Works Act in the past few days:

* The University of California Press differs from AAP on the Research
Works Act: http://bit.ly/yM5w13

* Nature Publishing Group, Digital Science and the AAAA do not support
the Research Works Act: http://bit.ly/wwgw3I

* The Library of Congress and RAND Corporation remain neutral on the
Research Works Act: http://bit.ly/ycouSd

* BioMed Central opposes the Research Works Act: http://bit.ly/xGZ0uQ

* Springer does not think the Research Works Act will be successful:
http://bit.ly/zXnaqZ

Richard Poynder

ATOM RSS1 RSS2