LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Apr 2017 21:40:53 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 21:37:30 -0400

A colleague pointed us to this STM-led initiative:

http://www.stm-assoc.org/standards-technology/ra21-resource-access-21st-century/

And I found the recent presentation given at a recent CNI meeting:

https://www.cni.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CNI_Resources_Shillum.pdf

The project is positively explained in the above sources.  Basically,
it's an effort to move away from IP authentication to more
sophisticated methods, which might help the user and also improve
publisher controls vis a vis published content.  Perhaps it might
reduce the SciHub (and like) problem?

I'd be interested in liblicense-l list members' comments on the pros
and cons of such an initiative and approach.  It would be most useful,
as this seems very important, and I'm guessing many of us feel
under-informed at this early stage.

Anyone on this list part of the pilots?

Thank you, Ann Okerson

ATOM RSS1 RSS2