LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 22:05:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
From: Sally Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:36:58 +0100

I am not aware of any statistics on the number of articles per publisher -
Jan, are you?

Sally Morris
South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex, UK  BN13 3UU
Email:  [log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Velterop <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:45:10 +0200

I'm quite surprised that 'journals' is still the unit of thought.
Surely, it's the number of articles published that counts?

Jan Velterop

Sent from my iPad

On 26 Jul 2012, at 23:28, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Sally Morris <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:02:17 +0100
>
> According to my calculations in 2007, the top 5 (now 4) publishers
> (Elsevier, Springer, T&F, Blackwell & Wiley) published nearly 25% of
> the journals in Ulrichs (about half of these on behalf of nonprofit
> organisations).
>
> In 1993 David Brown used figures supplied by BH Blackwell which
> indicated that 117 'large' publishers (out of a total of 17531)
> published 17086 (20%) of a total of 34833 journals.
>
> Sally Morris
> South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing West Sussex, UK  BN13 3UU
> Email:  [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2