LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:29:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
From: Scott Stangroom <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:20:33 -0400


I think, "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers".

~Scott

[MOD NOTE:  Can we do better than this???]


Quoting LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>:

> From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:51:03 -0400
>
> I'm participating in a Moodle course on copyright and licensing with a
> group of savvy African librarians, and they engage in lively questions on
> the forum's discussion board.
>
> Here's a question that arose the other day -- anyone have any good answers?
>  (SERU was mentioned.)  Thank you, Ann
>
>
> *Hannatu Abue Kugblenu - Friday, 27 March 2015, 1:37 AM  asked:  How can
> NESLI Model Licenses and publisher clauses be simplified for our librarians
> and students, as the technicalities in both clauses makes can be difficult
> to grasp?*
> *******

ATOM RSS1 RSS2