LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Jul 2019 09:31:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (90 lines)
From: Ian Gibson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 18:38:50 +0000

Apologies for responding to something so far back on the thread but
the impact on usage stats cuts both ways. On the one hand people go to
SciHub (and other sites that use compromised credentials to get at the
literature) and download stuff that they could have got from the
library and that drives down our usage totals. On the other hand
compromised credentials (used by SciHub and elsewhere) also generate
usage stats as they harvest things which messes up your stats in the
other direction. In the past I would have been comfortable saying that
the impact of the former is much greater than the impact of the
latter. After talking to our campus IT security folks I'm not nearly
as confident.

Cheers,
Ian

Ian Gibson, MISt
Acting Head, Collections Services
Brock University | Brock University Library
Niagara Region  |  1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way  |  St. Catharines, Ontario  L2S 3A1
E [log in to unmask] | T  905 688 5550  x6223  | @IanGibson11

________________________________
From: "Hinchliffe, Lisa W" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:20:00 +0000

But surely usage is considered? And as usage goes elsewhere it
devalues the big deal because the cost per download goes up.
Librarians don't have to be endorsing or encouraging use of
ResearchGate (or SciHub), whether to access licit or illicit copies,
for the reality of that use to be impacting on ata that effects
library subscriptions to content?

Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
[log in to unmask]

________________________________
From:  Joanne Romano <[log in to unmask]>
Date:  Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:33:18 +0000

I agree with Lucy's sentiments here. Budget levels, subscription price
increases, terms of use, ease of use, etc., are also my top concerns
also when negotiating with publishers.

Any user can choose to obtain free, pirated content from either
ResearchGate or SciHub.  But this fact does not influence my
decision-making, and isn't considered, when it comes to subscription
renewals.

Best regards,

Joanne

Joanne V. Romano, MLS
Head of Resource Management
Texas Medical Center Library
1133 John Freeman Blvd.
Houston, TX 77030
[log in to unmask]
Office: 713-799-7144
Fax:   713-799-7844
www.library.tmc.edu

________________________________
From: "Maziar, Lucy (EDU)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 18:49:26 +0000

It has certainly never been in the background on any negotiations with
vendors that I have been involved in.  My negotiations have always
about rising costs, static or reduced budgets, and the value of the
resource to my community along with license terms, customer service,
ease of use, etc.  Sci Hub and ResearchGate are never in my mind.  I
also would like to see the data that supports that statement that they
are in the background of every library negotiation with publishers.

Best,

Lucy

Lucia Maziar
Library Director
US Coast Guard Academy
Library (DL)
35 Mohegan Ave
New London CT  06320
860.444.8517
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2