LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:02:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:05:36 -0500

This passage was of particular interest to me:

> Since 1999, spending on books has fallen by almost a fifth in real terms, and from almost 12
> per cent of libraries' total spending to just over 8 per cent. Expenditure on serials, on the
> other hand, has increased sharply: from just under £70 million to over £130 million. In real
> terms this represents an increase of 63 per cent; journals' share of total library spendingrose
> from 16 per cent to almost 20 per cent.


I was under the impression that this change in the ratio of book to
journal spending had ceased during the past decade, and that spending
on books had leveled off.  I can't cite any studies to that effect
right off the top of my head, but I wonder if others can?

Sandy Thatcher


At 11:25 AM -0700 3/27/13, Heather Morrison wrote:

> Interesting preprint from Harvie, Lightfoot, Lilley and Weir:
> https://lra.le.ac.uk/bitstream/2381/9689/1/What%20are%20we%20to%20do%20with%20feral%20publishers%20final%20August%2031.pdf
>
> best,
>
> Heather G. Morrison

ATOM RSS1 RSS2