LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Sep 2012 14:42:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
From: Fred Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:33:57 -0400

Or rather from one of the many retracted "peer-reviewed" articles from
reputable publishers?

Fred W. Jenkins, Ph.D.
Professor and Associate Dean for Collections and Operations
University of Dayton Libraries
106A Roesch Library
Dayton, OH 45469-1360


On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: "Blobaum, Paul" <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:23:51 +0000
>
> Google Scholar retrieves "relevant" articles from predatory publishers
> without a reputable peer review process.
>
> Do you want your healthcare provider make decisions about your health
> after reading some article retrieved from Google Scholar without any
> authoritative review for what is included?
>
> Paul Blobaum MA, MS
> Full Professor
> Health and Human Services Librarian
> Governors State University Library
> University Park, IL   60484
> [log in to unmask]
> http://cvhl.ca             http://cvhl.ca/fr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2