LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Sep 2013 21:14:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:57:37 -0500

I have two questions about this initiative:

1) Why set up a new university press when there is already an
open-access university press successfully operating in Australia?
http://epress.anu.edu.au/

2) Does Kim Carr really mean "in the public domain," or is he (she?)
just confusing this with open access?

Sandy Thatcher



> From: Ann Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:25 PM
>
> Labor offers $12m lifeline to halt decline in Australian publishing.
> Support includes an Australian Universities Press to showcase publicly
> funded research and a permanent industry council
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/02/labor-lifeline-to-halt-publishing-decline

ATOM RSS1 RSS2