LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Nov 2013 22:02:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
From: Jim O'Donnell <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 19:04:49 -0500

Kent Anderson in the Scholarly Kitchen
(http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/11/05/not-the-answer-an-academic-carefully-assesses-the-arguments-for-open-access/)
points to an interesting essay by UK sociologist Daniel Allington, who
takes it for granted that mandated gold OA will prevail in the UK, but
has now had second thoughts about the process and offers an extensive
analysis:

http://www.danielallington.net/2013/10/open-access-why-not-answer/#sthash.643dajcu.dpbs

Jim O'Donnell
Georgetown U.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2