LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Subject: Re:CHORUS is a Trojan Horse
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 Jul 2014 15:57:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
From: "kc0mwl ." <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 02:17:01 -0500

CHORUS in its present form doesn't seem to be a Trojan Horse to me.
There's really nothing much there. It's not a repository, it's just a
means of access, or lack of access, as it were. It doesn't add much to
the mix, or take from it, from what I can tell.

Sue Gardner
University of Nebraska-Lincoln


On Friday, July 11, 2014, Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> CHORUS is a Trojan Horse, designed so that publishers retain control over the timing, terms and territory of any transition to Open Access.
> Think about it.
>
> http://j.mp/TrojanHorseChorus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2