LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:58:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
From: William Cohen <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 01:34:53 -0500

Thank you for the mention of Haworth Press.

Our old Haworth Press copyright agreement attempted to provide
to authors rights to privately disseminate their material
in a manner paralleling how printed author reprints (remember those?)
were provided upon publication, and often photocopied and shared.

Our approach was to encourage author reprint sharing mainly because we always
put an ad for the journal on the last page of each article.

Now, you can imagine how far back and dated that thinking was.

At that time, we didn't then appreciate how "posting" a pdf on
the internet took on the function of "re-publication."

The Taylor & Francis operation was far more sophisticated.

Their more analytic sales teams also dealt with new worlds of
Big Deals, tailored specialty packages, and complex library
consortia offerings in a manner far more befitting current needs.
Haworth Press did not have a "deep bench" in those areas.

In addition T&F  society publishing program, including
as it does such top-ranked journals of historic value, speaks for itself.

The new copyright needs of Taylor & Francis were quite different.  Although
opinions may vary (and they did),  they always in the end seemed
apt, appropriate and befitting.

 Bill

Bill Cohen, Founding Publisher
The Haworth Press



On 11/23/15 7:12 PM, LIBLICENSE wrote:

From: "Blobaum, Paul" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:35:30 +0000

Sure, Look at the Journal of the Medical Library Association.  This
was common with Haworth journals before Taylor and Francis bought it.
Authors retain copyright but give JMLA non exclusive license.

Paul

Paul Blobaum, M.A., M.S.
Follow my scholarship at: http://works.bepress.com/paul_blobaum
Full Professor
College of Health and Human Services Librarian Liaison
Scholarly Communications Librarian
Governors State University Library
University Park, IL  60484  708-534 4139  pblobaum at govst dot edu
________________________________

From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:26:15 -0500

Here's an interesting blog posting -- does anyone know of any
scholarly journals in which authors transfer copyright partially to
their publishers?  In principle it could be done, but do any journals
do this?

http://knowledgeisotopes.com/blog/open-access-and-copyright-the-changing-landscape-in-scholarly-publication/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2