From: Gretchen McCord <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:49:28 -0600
Those of you who missed the ALA CopyTalk session last week with
Meredith Rose, one of the attorneys responsible for the Public
Knowledge report reaming the C.O., might want to review the recording
of it:
http://www.ala.org/advocacy/pp/pub/copytalk
Meredith explained the oddities of the C.O. being a legislative agency
and talked a bit about the pros and cons of keeping it under LC or
moving it.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gretchen McCord MSIS, JD
Making sense of complex legal issues
TRAINING • CONSULTING • LEGAL COUNSEL
512.470.8932 | [log in to unmask]
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 5:27 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Adam Siegel <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 18:00:58 +0000
>
> I wouldn't say Pallante was "correct." She submitted her views for the record here:
>
> http://copyright.gov/laws/testimonies/022615-testimony-pallante.pdf.
>
> Adam
>
> Adam Siegel
> Bibliographer for Languages, Literatures, and Performing Arts
> Agricultural and Resource Economics Librarian
> University of California, Davis
> Davis CA 95616
> http://people.lib.ucdavis.edu/~apsiegel/
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Joseph Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 21:51:21 -0400
>
> It's good that the temperature on this debate is dropping, but I don't
> see the underlying issue being engaged: Isn't Pallante correct that
> the Copyright Office belongs elsewhere, preferably in the Department
> of Commerce? It sounds like Hayden is protecting her turf, as most
> people would want to do, but the substantive issue here is still not
> being addressed.
>
> Joe Esposito
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:42 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > From: "Jim O'Donnell" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:31:12 -0400
> >
> > Here's a fresh posting that outlines a sensible interpretation of the
> > developments at LC.
> >
> > https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20161031/16531435930/conspiracy-theories-run-amock-over-copyright-office-executive-changes.shtml
|
