LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 May 2014 23:33:40 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
From: Kathleen Shearer <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 13:47:55 -0400

(Sorry for any cross-posting)

Please feel free to distribute this statement to colleagues and
encourage other organizations who support this statement to become
signatories. Organizations can add their support by visiting the COAR
website or contact me directly https://www.coar-
repositories.org/?p=3989

---------

Major international associations join together to underscore their
support for immediate open access to research articles

May 14, 2014

As organizations committed to the principle that access to information
advances discovery, accelerates innovation and improves education, we
endorse the policies and practices that enable Open Access -
immediate, barrier free access to and reuse of scholarly articles.

Policies that promote Open Access are increasingly being adopted world
wide by research funders, academic institutions and national
governments in order to improve the use and value of scholarly
research. We fully support such policies and the dual avenues for
implementing them: open access repositories and open access journals.
These policies play an important role in creating an environment where
our collective investments in research can be maximized for the
benefit of the public, and for society at large.

Many policies have employed the use of embargo periods - delayed
access to research articles for a short period of time to help protect
publishers’ subscription revenue as they shift to new business models.
We consider the use of embargo periods as an acceptable transitional
mechanism to help facilitate a wholesale shift towards Open Access.
However, embargo periods dilute the benefits of open access policies
and we believe that, if they are adopted, they should be no more than
6 months for the life and physical sciences, 12 months for social
sciences and humanities.  We further believe that mechanisms for
reducing - or eliminating - embargo periods should be included in any
Open Access policy.

Any delay in the open availability of research articles curtails
scientific progress and stifles innovation, and places unnecessary
constraints in delivering the benefits of research back to the public.

Signatories

COAR: Confederation of Open Access Repositories

EIFL: Electronic Information for Libraries

LIBER: Ligue des Bibliothèques Européennes de Recherche - Association
of European Research Libraries

National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences

OpenAIRE: Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe

SPARC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition


For more information, contact Kathleen Shearer, Executive Director,
COAR, [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2