LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 1 Nov 2015 11:44:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
From: Gretchen McCord <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:53:23 -0500

It depends on how the document reads a a whole and what it says about
how the basic document and amendments are to be read together..THAT
SAID, it looks like the only thing they possibly could have INTENDED
was to negate your amendment.

Gretchen McCord, MSIS, JD
Editor, Copyright & New Media Law

ATOM RSS1 RSS2