LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Open Access Terminology
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:47:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
From: Joseph Esposito <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:25:26 -0800

I just stumbled on a story on PaidContent, which I clicked on because
the headline mentioned Open Access.  Here is the story:

http://paidcontent.org/article/419-hollywood-lambasts-sky-movies-ruling-but-open-access-gains-favour

Is this story about the open access to research literature?  No, it's
about access to set-top boxes for video in the UK.

People who believe that OA has an unambiguous meaning are denying the facts.

Joe Esposito

--
Joseph J. Esposito
Portable CEO
[log in to unmask]
@josephjesposito
+Joseph Esposito

ATOM RSS1 RSS2