LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 9 Jun 2013 13:18:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
From: Iris Brest <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 16:38:03 -0700

Maybe if they were corporate works, but if the author is a person, it's
unlikely that postdating the work will extend his life....  Iris Brest

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Hansen <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:44:53 -0400

Postdating copyright notice sounds like a punishable offense to me:

See 17 U.S.C 506(c) "Fraudulent Copyright Notice.- Any person who, with
fraudulent intent, places on any article a notice of copyright or words of
the same purport that such person knows to be false, or who, with
fraudulent intent, publicly distributes or imports for public distribution
any article bearing such notice or words that such person knows to be
false, shall be fined not more than $2,500."

The notice provision (17 USC 401) is clear that the date is supposed to be
the date of first publication of the work.

Not sure who enforces a punishment like that. Maybe the Copyright Office
has a complaints department?

Dave Hansen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2