LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:32:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
From: "Hamaker, Charles" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:59:49 +0000

I realize this has been touched on here earlier, but I just ran across
the THE piece and a corresponding blog post that gives an alternative
perspective on the the issues.

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=422188

Dec. 20th, but interesting. As a  contrary view of the history editors
perspective see: On /That/ Statement by History Journal Editors

A blog post by Dr. Martin Pauleve

https://www.martineve.com/2012/12/20/on-that-statement-by-history-journal-editors/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Charles Hamaker M.L.S | Associate University Librarian Collection
Development and Electronic Resources
UNC Charlotte
J. Murrey Atkins Library
Charlotte, NC 28223
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2