LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 May 2016 20:59:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
From: Thomas Krichel <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 05:06:44 +0000


Stevan Harnad writes

> Shame on SSRN.

Why? I am certainly looking forward to SSRN becoming as undynamic as
Mendeley after an Elsevier takeover.

> I don't know about Arxiv (needless centralization and its concentrated
> expenses are always vulnerabe to faux-benign take-overs) but what's sure is
> that the distributed network of Green institutional repositories
> worldwide is not for sale, and that is their strength...

RePEc can not be bought either. I created it before institutional
repositories came along. It is based on the same principles as
institutional repositories.


--

Cheers,

Thomas Krichel                  http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                            skype:thomaskrichel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2