LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:29:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:58:03 -0500

It strikes me that very little if what is said in this article applies
to monograph publishing or even to journal publishing in the
humanities. The suggestions are interesting, but not widely applicable
to all scholarly output.

Sandy Thatcher

> From: kalev leetaru <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:18:23 -0400
>
> Thought many of you would like my latest piece on the open access
> debate, especially towards the second half where I talk about how AI
> can eventually replace reviewer selection and how the transition of
> encyclopedias from dead tree editions to the living dynamic repository
> of Wikipedia might offer one glimpse into how academic publishing
> might be reimagined in the digital era:
>
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/06/14/should-all-academic-research-be-free-and-what-wikipedia-can-teach-us-about-publishing/
>
>
> ~Kalev
> http://kalevleetaru.com/
> http://blog.gdeltproject.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2