LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:11:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:35:55 -0500

Forwarded from another list for any liblicense-l comment and reply.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jan Clark <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:14 AM
Subject: Law clauses in licences
To: [log in to unmask]

Can anyone tell me how they handle foreign law clauses in site
licences please?  Our normal procedure is to ask publishers if they
will change the stated law or remain silent on the subject (allowing
us to cross out the clause).  In most cases publishers are happy to do
this, but occasionally we come across a publisher who is reluctant to
do this.  We are currently experiencing this with Thieme, which may
result in our not being able to subscribe to a particular journal that
has been requested by a department.  The clause mentioning law states:

"6.3 The provisions of substantive law applicable within the Federal
Republic of Germany shall apply exclusively, and the principles of the
conflict of laws under private international law, which would justify
the applicability of foreign law, shall not apply."

Our logic is that we can't agree to abide by laws we don't understand
- but are we being super-cautious?  What do other people do?

Thanks
Jan

Jan Clark
Robinson Library
Newcastle University
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE2 4HQ

ATOM RSS1 RSS2