LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:09:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:05:11 -0400

My apologies for the incorrect URL.  Too much copy/pasting going on
at the same time.  The correct URL is:

http://blog.wellcome.ac.uk/2014/03/28/the-cost-of-open-access-publishing-a-progress-report/

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 7:01 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Ann Shumelda Okerson <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 09:06:29 -0400
>
> Of wide interest:
>
> The Wellcome Trust recently published details of how much it spent on
> open access publishing in the year 2012-2013 in an attempt to make the
> debate around the costs of open access publishing more evidence-based.
> The data released fuelled much discussion online and Robert Kiley,
> Head Digital Services at the Wellcome Library, gives an update...
>
> Blog posting includes sections on:
>
> Are the publishers doing what they're paid to do?
>
> What do the data show?
>
> Elsevier a case study

ATOM RSS1 RSS2