LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:50:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
From: "Blobaum, Paul" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 02:28:06 +0000

Wouldn't the threat of not getting another NIH grant be enough to
ensure compliance?

Paul Blobaum, M.A., M.S.
Full Professor
College of Health and Human Services Librarian Liaison
Governors State University Library
University Park, IL  60484  708-534 4139  pblobaum at govst dot edu

________________________________________
From: "Hansen, Dave" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:28:06 +0000

Does anyone on this list have an idea of how the NIH enforces its
public access policy? I recently had a conversation with someone who
has viewed several NIH non-compliance letters. She expressed some
consternation that, while letters sometimes go out about
non-compliance, there is no real force behind them and nothing that
effectively compels compliance. I couldn’t find any more info from the
NIH itself.

Does anyone have any idea how prevalent non-compliance is and how
frequently NIH takes actions to enforce the policy, and for those
library lawyers that I know lurk around on this list, who (if anyone)
would be able to contest non-enforcement by the NIH?*

*I’m not trying to pick a fight. I’d just like to know who has the
right to do such a thing.

-----

David R. Hansen
Digital Library Fellow
Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic
UC Berkeley School of Law
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2