LIBLICENSE-L Archives

LibLicense-L Discussion Forum

LIBLICENSE-L@LISTSERV.CRL.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:10:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
From: "Cole, Christopher" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:03:14 +0000

Rick:

You are not misunderstanding the original proposal. It has just
transmorgrified via e-mail discussion.

Chris


Christopher Cole
Manager, Business Development
National Agricultural Library
Belstville, MD 20705-2351


-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 04:20:23 +0000

OK, so I'm now starting to wonder if I've fundamentally misunderstood
the proposal that's under discussion here. Everyone's comments seem to
be about a system whereby the general public reviews the content of
scholarly journals. I thought we were talking about a system whereby
scholars rate the experiences they have with scholarly journals in
their role as authors.

Have I completely misunderstood?

---
Rick Anderson
Interim Dean
J. Willard Marriott Library University of Utah
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2