From: Sean Johnson Andrews <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 22:38:21 -0500

Be that as it may, the assertion that the fair use provision only
applies to print seems to unilaterally build a wall where the door
once was, which is hardly a disinterested interpretation of the law.
It is an assertion that should indeed be vociferously ridiculed.

On May 14, 2013, at 9:02 PM, LIBLICENSE <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Sandy Thatcher <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 18:02:07 -0500
>
> Well, maybe not, since outside of a specific set of factual
> circumstances, no one knows what "fair use" means. And given how some
> people and associations (like the ARL) interpret it, this opens a door
> wide enough to drive a Mack truck through!
>
> Sandy Thatcher
>
>
>> From: Winston Tabb <[log in to unmask]>
>> Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 21:35:29 +0000
>>
>> That is a ridiculous assertion by Wiley.